eDiscovery Daily Blog

In addition to its software and professional services, CloudNine also provides extensive education to eDiscovery practitioners as highlighted by its publication of the eDiscovery Daily Blog. Authored and edited by industry expert Doug Austin, the eDiscovery Daily is the go-to resource for thousands of eDiscovery and eDisclosure professionals seeking to keep up with the latest news and case law in the world of digital discovery.
Close
Enter your
text here
No Bad Faith Means No Sanctions for Failing to Preserve Video of Altercation: eDiscovery Case Law
 No Bad Faith Means No Sanctions for Failing to Preserve Video of Altercation: eDiscovery Case Law 479 270 Doug Austin
By:

In Stovall v. Brykan Legends, LLC, Kansas Magistrate Judge James P. O’Hara denied the plaintiff’s motion for sanctions based on the defendant’s alleged spoliation of a surveillance video that shows an altercation between the plaintiff and her supervisor, stating that “plaintiff has failed to meet the requirements of Fed. R. Civ. P. 37(e)(2)”.

read more
How Many States Have Security Breach Notification Laws? You Might Be Surprised: Cybersecurity Trends
 How Many States Have Security Breach Notification Laws? You Might Be Surprised: Cybersecurity Trends 619 383 Doug Austin
By:

Usually, I end each blog post with “So, what do you think?”, but this time I’m starting with it. How many states do you think have some sort of legislation requiring private or governmental entities to notify individuals of security breaches of information involving personally identifiable information (PII)? Ten? Twenty? Thirty? You might be surprised.

read more
NY Appeals Court Extends Discoverability of Social Media Photos to “Tagged” Photos: eDiscovery Case Law
 NY Appeals Court Extends Discoverability of Social Media Photos to “Tagged” Photos: eDiscovery Case Law 479 270 Doug Austin
By:

In Vasquez-Santos v. Mathew, the New York Appellate Division, First Department panel “unanimously reversed” an order by the Supreme Court, New York County last June that denied the defendant’s motion to compel access by a third-party data mining company to plaintiff’s devices, email accounts, and social media accounts, so as to obtain photographs and other evidence of plaintiff engaging in physical activities and granted the defendant’s motion.

read more
My Love for What I Do: eDiscovery Love Story
 My Love for What I Do: eDiscovery Love Story 454 454 Doug Austin
By:

It’s Valentine’s Day! As you can guess from the picture for this post, I do! I hope you all have a special someone with which you can share Valentine’s Day. Regardless of that, I hope you all love what you do as much as I do.

read more
Germans Order Facebook To Change How it Collects User Data: Data Privacy Trends
 Germans Order Facebook To Change How it Collects User Data: Data Privacy Trends 689 388 Doug Austin
By:

Two days, two stories about Germans finding fault with companies’ handling of personal data….

read more
In Today’s Privacy Environment, That’s the Way the (Website) Cookie Crumbles: Data Privacy Trends
 In Today’s Privacy Environment, That’s the Way the (Website) Cookie Crumbles: Data Privacy Trends 569 372 Doug Austin
By:

It’s only been three weeks, but we’ve already talked plenty about the first big GDPR fine of €50 million (or about $56.8 million) fine to Google for failing to comply with GDPR. Sure, you’re thinking “that’s Google, I can see how they got fined, but nothing to worry about here”. Right? Well, you may want to think again.

read more
Court Denies Non-Party’s Request to Quash Subpoena in Telecommunications Dispute: eDiscovery Case Law
 Court Denies Non-Party’s Request to Quash Subpoena in Telecommunications Dispute: eDiscovery Case Law 479 270 Doug Austin
By:

In Fair v. Commc’ns Unlimited Inc., Missouri District Judge Rodney W. Sippel denied the motion to quash discovery filed by non-party Charter Communications (Charter), finding that the plaintiff had demonstrated that she had been unable to obtain the information from the defendants, that her request was not overbroad or unduly burdensome, that the information requested would not disclose personally identifiable information (PII) and that any sensitive or confidential information could be protected with redactions or a protective order.

read more
EDRM Releases the Final Version of its TAR Guidelines: eDiscovery Best Practices
 EDRM Releases the Final Version of its TAR Guidelines: eDiscovery Best Practices 189 111 Doug Austin
By:

During last year’s EDRM Spring Workshop, I discussed on this blog that EDRM had released the preliminary draft of its Technology Assisted Review (TAR) Guidelines for public comment. They gave a mid-July deadline for comments and I even challenged the people who didn’t understand TAR very well to review it and provide feedback – after all, those are the people who would hopefully stand to benefit the most from these guidelines. Now, over half a year later, EDRM has released the final version of its TAR Guidelines.

read more
Relying on Interpretation of the SCA, Appeals Court Reverses Subpoenas Against Facebook: eDiscovery Case Law
 Relying on Interpretation of the SCA, Appeals Court Reverses Subpoenas Against Facebook: eDiscovery Case Law 479 270 Doug Austin
By:

In Facebook, Inc. v. Wint, the District of Columbia Court of Appeals, stating that “[t]he plain text of the SCA (Stored Communications Act) thus appears to foreclose Facebook from complying with Mr. Wint’s subpoenas”, concluded that the appellee “has not established the existence of a serious constitutional doubt that could warrant application of the doctrine of avoidance” reversing the trial court’s order holding Facebook in civil contempt for refusing to comply with subpoenas served by appellee Daron Wint.

read more
Observations about Legaltech 2019 from Attendees, Part Two: eDiscovery Trends
 Observations about Legaltech 2019 from Attendees, Part Two: eDiscovery Trends 431 210 Doug Austin
By:

As I’ve done the past three years, I reached out to several attendees of Legaltech New York (LTNY) 2019 (some of whom I met with during the show) to get their thoughts and impressions of this year’s show. We had so many people respond that I decided to split their feedback into two posts. Yesterday was the first half, here are the remaining observations. And, no, I didn’t split this into two posts just so I could save myself another day of writing, my observations are at the bottom of this post. ;o)

read more
By using this site you agree that we can place cookies on your device. See our privacy policy for details.